Dienstag, 21. August 2018, 20:03 UTC+2

Sie sind nicht angemeldet.

  • Anmelden

Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: Ruperts, Blumenhomepage. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.



Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2009, 22:35





Sonntag, 10. Dezember 2017 (Ganztägig)


Jedes Jahr im Dezember, am 10. Tag des Monats



10.12.1901 in St.Petersburg geb.,

31.3.1983 in Moskau gest.,
sein Markenzeichen war ein Esel.

6 Kommentare

Dienstag, 27. Januar 2015, 21:54



Hey Rarst, You are running a nice blog here. I would like to intive you to enter yourself in a contest for a chance to win a free blog review from me. Just subscribe to my RSS feed by EMAIL and let me know you have by emailing me or commenting under my Giveaway post. Good luck and Happy Blogging!! http://nnmelbievjx.com [url=http://tqiwgpgi.com]tqiwgpgi[/url] [link=http://bhfnbvudnvn.com]bhfnbvudnvn[/link]

Sonntag, 25. Januar 2015, 13:47



The arguments<a href="http://nnvgkopmii.com"> ansagit</a> creationism and the like are often quite humorless and condescending. A case in point is the Stanley Kramer film 'Inherit the Wind' which drags on long after the audience 'gets' the argument.What the votaries of science overlook is that religion is the "opium of the masses". People indulge in it because they find it comforting and not neccessarily due to ignorance of science.Woody Allen's greatest film 'Crimes and Misdemeanors' is probably the most subtle in presenting the debate between belief and unbelief. The film transcends the moronic 'science vs religion' debate and instead poses the provocative question - 'Should we prefer God over truth?'. During the film, we get to know the lives of men who would answer that question quite differently. The audience is not coerced to make up its mind.The problem with a lot of 'rationalist' commentators is their ironically evangelical urge to make up the mind of their audience.

Sonntag, 25. Januar 2015, 11:51



PatI just checked out Isenbergs Fallen Father . I too have been rnaeidg several books on the founding fathers, including Chernow's book on Hamilton, McCullough on John Adams, others. They all paint Burr in a very unfavorable light. So I was interested in Isenbergs premise since it conflicted with previous notions about Burr. She seems to be an ardent feminist and liberal. People like this, I instinctively mistrust because they seem to delight in going against the grain just for the sake of going against the grain. I would love to see Chernow comment on this. http://qsofocbw.com [url=http://ikocvipj.com]ikocvipj[/url] [link=http://djvigbpijf.com]djvigbpijf[/link]

Samstag, 24. Januar 2015, 11:28



Real brain power on <a href="http://zjbicea.com">diapsly.</a> Thanks for that answer!

Freitag, 23. Januar 2015, 17:46



Hey, kilelr job on that one you guys!